Skip to main content
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Dynamic Fabry-Pérot cavity stabilization technique for atom-cavity experiments


We present a stabilization technique developed to lock and dynamically tune the resonant frequency of a moderate finesse Fabry-Pérot (FP) cavity used in precision atom-cavity quantum electrodynamics (QED) experiments. Most experimental setups with active stabilization either operate at one fixed resonant frequency or use transfer cavities to achieve the ability to tune the resonant frequency of the cavity. In this work, we present a simple and cost-effective solution to actively stabilize an optical cavity while achieving a dynamic tuning range of over 100 MHz with a precision under 1 MHz. Our unique scheme uses a reference laser locked to an electro-optic modulator (EOM) shifted saturation absorption spectroscopy (SAS) signal. The cavity is locked to the PDH error signal obtained from the dip in the reflected intensity of this reference laser. Our setup provides the feature to efficiently tune the resonant frequency of the cavity by only changing the EOM drive without unlocking and re-locking either the reference laser or the cavity. We present measurements of precision control of the resonant cavity frequency and vacuum Rabi splitting (VRS) to quantify the stability achieved and hence show that this technique is suitable for a variety of cavity QED experiments.

1 Introduction

Cavities find applications in quantum electrodynamics (QED) [14], precision spectroscopy [58] all the way to gravitational wave detection [9, 10], to give a few diverse examples of the versatility of these systems. Several experiments study a multitude of physical phenomena originating from a combined system containing an optical cavity and an intra-cavity single atom or an ensemble of atoms [1117]. In these experiments, the optical cavity can be tuned to a desired frequency close to the atomic transition, and an ensemble of atoms can be cooled and confined to have spatial overlap with the mode defined by the geometric properties of the cavity, thus coupling the atoms to the cavity. In our experimental setup, we study the effects of interactions between ultra-cold dilute gas of atoms in a magneto-optical trap (MOT) and a resonant moderate finesse Fabry-Perot (FP) cavity [1821] in which a weak probe beam along the cavity axis is typically scanned over several tens of megahertz within a few milliseconds. For effective measurements at low signal levels, the experiment needs multiple repetitions. To achieve this, the resonant condition of the cavity needs to be held constant with respect to the cavity mode coupled atoms.

To perform these measurements efficiently, it is necessary to either actively or passively stabilize the FP cavity to compensate for any drifts in the length of the cavity due to temperature fluctuations, acoustic noise, etc. Passive stabilization is achieved by using ultralow thermal expansion materials and vibration-resistant mounting designs to build the cavity [2228] and active stabilization techniques use feedback loops to maintain the resonant frequency of the cavity [2933]. The existing active stabilization techniques use transfer cavities to shift the lock point and hence achieve the dynamic tuning property. In this paper, we propose a Pound-Drever-Hall (PDH) [3436] based active stabilization scheme of the cavity that uses only two lasers. The FP cavity is locked to a reference laser which is in turn locked to an electro-optic modulator (EOM) shifted, saturation absorption spectroscopy (SAS) signal. A feature of our setup allows us to tune the resonant frequency of the cavity over a range of over a hundred MHz with a sensitivity of 1 MHz by introducing a shift in the reference laser frequency without unlocking either the cavity or the reference laser. Thus, a locking technique that can be dynamically tuned over a wide frequency range can be implemented in experiments where we want to study the dependence of light scattered by the coupled atom-cavity system as a function of the detuning between the atomic transition and cavity frequency. Our main objective in presenting this work is to show how one can develop a relatively low investment and robust lock setup that bypasses using the transfer cavity to achieve the dynamic tuning ability. In this paper, we describe, the general experimental setup, the technique implemented to tune and stabilize the cavity, the configuration of the reference laser, the setup used to generate the necessary error signal, and the sensitivity, effectiveness, and tuning range of the implemented technique.

2 Experimental setup

The six laser cooling beams and a gradient magnetic field form the 85Rb MOT that confines atoms at the center of the FP cavity formed by two high reflectivity mirrors, as shown in Fig. 1. The Fabry-Perot cavity consists of two identical spherical mirrors of diameter 12.5 mm, radius of curvature ≈ 50 mm, separation of ≈ 45 mm, a beam waist of ≈ 78 μm and has a linewidth of nearly ≈ 8.8 MHz at 780 nm and a free spectral range of 3.3 GHz. The input mirror is attached to an annular piezoelectric transducer (PZT). The 780 nm resonant probe beam (red) and the 767 nm cavity lock beam (blue) are coupled into the cavity so that they are both simultaneously resonant with the cavity mode. On the input side, a quarter-wave plate (QWP) and half-wave plate (HWP) combination in conjunction with two polarization beam splitting cubes (PBS) are used to separate the back reflected beams from the input mirror of the cavity, and the 767 light is captured by the photodiode (PD) to measure the light intensity dip in the reflected light when the cavity is resonant with the 767 nm as shown in Fig. 2. This allows the creation of a feedback signal to the PZT and locks the cavity length as discussed further in section B.

Figure 1
figure 1

Schematic of the experiment. Six laser cooling beams (light brown) create the MOT between the cavity mirrors. The other element shown are annular piezoelectric transducer (PZT), The description of the operation is in the text

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic of the experimental setup implemented to reference the cavity. The stabilized reference laser is transferred to the experimental table through an optical fiber. Labels: QWP quarter waveplate, HWP half waveplate, PBS polarizing beam splitter, ML mode matching lens, HWP half-wave plate, QWP quarter waveplate, BPF premium bandpass filter, M mirror, CCD charge-coupled device, PD photodiode and PMT photomultiplier tube, RFO rf oscillator, LPF low pass filter, PBS1, PBS2 are polarizing beam splitters. The HWP between PBS1 and PBS2 is close to 45 degrees to minimize the probe power fed to the cavity while ensuring that sufficient power of the reference laser reflected by the cavity gets directed to the PD

The 780 nm probe light is transmitted through the appropriately tuned locked cavity for probing the atoms. The transmitted light through the cavity is passed through a premium 780 nm band pass filter (BPF) (Thorlabs-FBH780-10) and detected by the CCD camera and the photomultiplier tube (PMT). The spatial overlap of the cavity mode and the MOT density profile is measured to obtain the number of atoms coupled to the cavity. In our experiment, prominent collective strong coupling effects such as vacuum Rabi splitting (VRS) [4, 37, 38] can be detected when a few thousands of atoms are coupled to the cavity. A 780 nm laser referenced to a Rb saturated absorption spectroscopy (SAS) signal is used to probe VRS. This probe laser is incident along the axis of the cavity. As the atoms of interest are 85Rb, whose 5S1/2–5P3/2(D2) transition wavelength is at 780nm a separate wavelength has to be used to lock the cavity. This laser has to be far off-resonance from 85Rb D2 transitions to avoid any interaction with the cavity-coupled atoms. The coatings of the cavity restricted the choice of the reference laser to within 780±100 nm. Keeping these conditions in mind, a 767 nm laser is chosen as the reference laser to lock the cavity. A 40 dB premium bandpass filter is placed in the cavity transmission collection setup to ensure that the contribution of the reference laser in the measured transmitted signal is well below the average noise level. The 767 nm laser needs to be locked to a potassium SAS signal since the drift in its frequency changes the resonant frequency of the cavity and impacts the precision of the experiment This SAS locked frequency is noted using a wavemeter.

2.1 Scheme of the lock

Initially, the 780 nm probe laser is locked to an independent rubidium SAS setup while the FP cavity and the 767 nm reference laser are kept unlocked. A CCD camera is used to observe the spatial profile of the transmitted light from the cavity. The unlocked cavity is tuned to transmit TEM00 mode of 780 nm probe laser by adjusting the voltage of the cavity PZT. As the cavity frequency is scanned about this TEM00 mode over a range of 40 MHz, the characteristic Lorentzian peak is observed in the cavity transmission signal. Any major drifts or fluctuations in the cavity length are countered by manually adjusting the cavity PZT voltage in order to ensure that this transmission peak, corresponding to the resonance condition for TEM00 mode of probe laser, would be seen in each scan cycle. While maintaining this transmission peak within the scan range, the frequency of the 767 nm reference laser is changed by gradually varying the laser controller offset. This is done until a dip in the reflected intensity of the reference laser and the corresponding PDH error signal is observed to coincide with the transmission peak of the probe on an oscilloscope. Thus, a condition is experimentally achieved where the cavity can be stabilized using the PDH error signal produced by the 767 nm reference laser while being simultaneously nearly resonant to the TEM00 mode of the 780 nm probe. At this point, the cavity length is approximately a common multiple of both the wavelengths corresponding to the probe and the reference laser. Let, L be the cavity length, c the speed of light, \({\nu}_{p}\) and \({n}_{p}\) respectively, be the frequency and the longitudinal eigen mode number corresponding to the TEM00 mode of the probe laser sustained in the cavity, \({\nu}_{r}\) and \({n}_{r}\) be the frequency and longitudinal eigen mode number of the mode of reference laser. Then while keeping \({\nu}_{p}\) and \({n}_{p}\) constant, \({\nu}_{r}\) and in turn, \({n}_{r}\) are varied until the condition \({L}\approx{c}\cdot n_{p}/\nu_{p} \approx c\cdot n_{r}/{\nu}_{r}\) is satisfied. The reference laser frequency corresponding to this condition is noted on the wavemeter. This frequency is different from the SAS locked value. This preliminary measurement allows an appropriate choice combination of EOM and acoustic-optic modulator (AOM) required to introduce the necessary shift in the reference laser frequency from its SAS locked value. The reference laser is stabilized at the approximately required frequency and the FP cavity is in turn locked to the corresponding PDH error signal. Finally, the reference laser frequency is fine-tuned, without unlocking either the cavity or the laser itself, by adjusting only the EOM drive to maximize the transmitted intensity of the probe, thus achieving the desired condition, \(L=c\cdot n_{p}/\nu_{p} = {c} \cdot n_{r}/\nu_{r}\).

2.2 Configuration of the reference laser

A Toptica DL-100 extended cavity diode laser operated at 767 nm, stabilized to potassium SAS is used as the reference to lock the cavity, see Fig. 3 for the schematic of the experimental setup of the reference laser. The 767 nm reference laser is transmitted through a fiber-based EOM to achieve the relative frequency shift between the probe and reference resonances, modulo the cavity-free spectral range (FSR). In an earlier attempt, the EOM output was fed to a potassium SAS setup to obtain three SAS signals. One for the central frequency and one for each sideband generated by the EOM. In this scheme, the 767 nm laser is directly referenced to the SAS signal corresponding to the appropriate sideband. However, due to the large driving frequency, sufficient power could not be transferred to the sideband to obtain a clean sideband SAS signal.

Figure 3
figure 3

Setup of 767 nm reference laser. Schematic representation of the optical circuit of the reference laser. Labels: M mirror, L lens, K potassium, HWP half-wave plate, QWP quarter wave plate, PBS1, PBS2, PBS3, PBS4 are polarizing beam splitters, AOM acoustic-optic modulator, EOM1 fiber electro-optic modulator, EOM2 free space electro-optic modulator. The output of DL 100 is passed through a combination of AOM and fiber-based EOM to obtain the desired shift in the frequency. Before the output is taken to the experimental table, it is passed through a free-space EOM to create sidebands for PDH locking

To avoid this issue in the present scheme the reference laser output from the Toptica DL-100 is divided into two arms. The first arm is passed through a double pass AOM setup driven at 200 MHz to generate a 400 MHz shift in the reference laser frequency. The second arm is passed through the EOM to achieve the remainder of the shift. At this drive frequency, sufficient power can be transferred to the sideband, and a high-quality error signal for the sideband SAS can be obtained to lock the reference laser. After the double pass AOM setup, the first arm is further subdivided into two parts, one of which is fed to a wavemeter to monitor the reference laser frequency, and the other is passed through a free space Qubig EOM and coupled into a polarization maintaining single mode optical fiber to transfer it to the experimental table. When the cavity is tuned in resonance with the reference laser, the intensity of reference laser light reflected from the input mirror of the cavity dips.

The free space EOM is driven by the internal oscillator of the PDH module used to lock the cavity to generate the sidebands required to obtain the error signal from this reflection dip. On stabilizing the 767 nm reference laser to the potassium SAS signal, the wavemeter readings showed a standard deviation of ≈ 100 kHz, which is about the least count of the instrument. Since the cavity is made to follow the frequency of the reference laser, the length of the cavity is stabilized at a comparable frequency linewidth.

2.3 Cavity referencing setup

The probe beam and the modulated reference laser are mixed using a half-wave plate and PBS2 as shown in Fig. 2. The output of the PBS is aligned along the axis of the cavity. A 150 mm focal length convex lens is used to match the spatial mode profile of the two lasers with that defined by the FP cavity. This lens ensured that the two lasers are maximally coupled to the cavity. A quarter-wave plate is placed close to the window of the vacuum chamber. This quarter-wave plate introduced the shift in polarization required to separate out and measure the reflected intensity of the reference laser on a photodiode. On resonance, the cavity transmits the reference laser and a corresponding dip can be observed in the photodiode signal. The reflective dip is the order of 1% dip in the reflected intensity.

The PDH internal oscillator drove the free space EOM to modulate the laser frequency at 20 MHz to produce sidebands in the reflection dip. Since the cavity linewidth at 767 nm is over 10 MHz, the two sidebands can not be well resolved from the central feature in the dip. The shape of the error signal can be adjusted to produce a steep slope near resonance by carefully choosing the phase. At low oscillator power, the error signal strength increased with an increase in the amplitude of the PDH internal oscillator. However, as the sidebands are not well separated, a further increase in the amplitude of the internal oscillator would distort the signal. Despite the small amplitude and limited resolution of the dip, a good error signal is generated by optimizing the amplitude and the phase of the PDH internal oscillator, see Fig. 4. The optimized error signal is fed to a proportional, integration and derivative (PID) module which controls the cavity PZT voltage, thus stabilizing the cavity length. Figure 4 shows the optimized PDH error signal and the PID signal upon locking the cavity. The 780 nm bandpass filter in the collection setup ensured that of both the frequencies transmitted by the cavity, only the contribution from 780 nm probe is measured by the photo-multiplier tube (PMT).

Figure 4
figure 4

PDH error signal to lock the cavity. Inset is the oscilloscope trace of a locked signal. Cavity is scanned across the resonance of the 767 nm reference laser to obtain the standard PDH error signal (red curve) from the dip in the reflected intensity. The inset graph (blue curve) shows the oscilloscope trace of a locked signal

3 Sensitivity and tuning ability of the lock

Following the extensive setup, an experiment is conducted to measure the intensity of the probe transmitted through the empty cavity as a function of reference laser frequency. A constant 5 micro Watt power of a probe laser locked to \(F={3}\) to \(F'={3}\) D2 line of 85Rb transition is kept incident along the cavity axis on the input mirror. The reference laser is locked to the appropriate sideband SAS signal and the cavity is locked to the error signal of the reflection dip. The fully stabilized cavity is now swept across the probe frequency by changing the drive frequency of the fiber-based EOM (Eospace) in steps of 1 MHz. This effectively changes the resonant frequency of the cavity in steps of 1 MHz. It must be noted that since \(\Delta \nu _{p}=\Delta \nu _{r}\cdot n_{p}/n_{r}\), where \(n_{p}/n_{r}\ne 1 \), a change of 1 MHz in 767 nm reference laser frequency will not translate to 1 MHz change in the resonant frequency of the 780 nm probe. The average intensity of the TEM00 mode of the 780 nm probe transmitted by the cavity is measured at each step for 10 seconds. The graph in Fig. 5 shows the average intensity and the standard deviation versus the resonant frequency of the cavity. The ability to distinguish between the average intensity in steps of 1 MHz and the flexibility to tune the cavity over a range 100 MHz without unlocking and relocking any of the components demonstrates the precision, sensitivity, and tunability of the cavity lock.

Figure 5
figure 5

Transmitted intensity of probe versus reference laser detuning. The plot shows the intensity of transmitted 780 nm probe light from the cavity versus wavemeter reading reference laser frequency. In this measurement, the cavity is locked to the reference laser, and the transmission of the probe is measured for various detunings of the reference laser for approximately two seconds. Each black dot represents the mean and the error bar is the standard deviation of the transmitted intensity at a given detuning. The value of the error bar is observed to increase near zero detuning. This is because of the Lorentzian nature of the transmission of light through an FP cavity. The reference laser frequency is changed in steps and the intensity of the transmitted probe light is measured

To demonstrate the utility of the cavity stabilization mechanism in cavity QED experiments, we present a comparison of symmetry and precision in measuring VRS in our atom-cavity experiment before and after the implementation of the locking scheme. In the collective strong coupling regime, the split between the two normal modes of VRS is given by \(g_{0}\sqrt{N_{c}}\), where \(g_{0}\) is the atom-cavity interaction strength for a single atom and \(N_{c}\) is the effective number of atoms coupled to the cavity.

We observe a double peak structure characteristic of VRS on probing at \(F={3}\) to \(F'={3}\) of 85Rb D2 by using a weak light incident along the axis of the cavity [18]. The \(F={3}\) to \(F'={4}\) of 85Rb D2 laser is used for cooling transition for our MOT and needs to be turned off to ensure that the maximum number of atoms are prepared at the ground state of the probing transition. The MOT isotropically expands with a time constant of the order of a few milliseconds. Therefore, the probe is scanned within a millisecond, demanding a minimum scan rate of the order of 1 kHz. This demands a higher bandwidth PMT pre-amplifier. In the higher bandwidth setting, the pre-amplifier generates higher noise, thus reducing the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the transmission. To improve the SNR, the transmitted signal has to be averaged over several cycles. Before implementing the cavity stabilizing mechanism, small drifts, and fluctuations in the cavity length during the several consecutive cycles, would make the 2 peaks in the VRS asymmetric as seen in Fig. 6a, 6b, and 6c. Once the cavity is stabilized using the reference laser, an average of over 100 cycles can be successfully performed and we get a symmetric VRS as shown in Fig. 6d, which can be used to estimate the number of atoms coupled to the cavity with much higher reliability.

Figure 6
figure 6

VRS of a locked versus an unlocked cavity The plot shows the averaged transmitted intensity of the probe versus detuning of the probe light from \(F={3}\)-3′ transition of 85Rb under collective strong coupling condition. The two peak structure VRS is obtained by scanning the probe laser around the atomic transition. Fig. (a), Fig. (b), and Fig. (c) are plotted by taking the averages of the data from 0–10, 45–55, and 90–100 respectively. The symmetric VRS peak shown in Fig. (d) is obtained when there is an active stabilization on the length of the cavity. In the unlocked case, during the measurement, the resonant frequency of the optical cavity changes due to the drift and fluctuations in the length, as a result, the expected symmetry in the double-peak structured VRS is lost

It can be clearly observed that the split in the VRS changes with time in the absence of the cavity lock due to cavity drifts, while it remains unchanged with the cavity lock in place as shown in Fig. 7. This demonstrates the efficiency of our FP cavity stabilization technique.

Figure 7
figure 7

The plot (a) shows the drift of the unlocked cavity with time and (b) is the measured VRS split of an unlocked cavity versus a locked cavity. We allowed the cavity to drift and the probe laser is continuously scanned across the resonant transition to obtain the VRS split at various times, each dot is the data of the VRS split averaged over 10 such scans. In the unlocked case, the fluctuations in the length of the cavity cause changes in resonant frequency and this introduces an unequal detuning between the atom and the cavity during the measurement cycle. In Fig. 7(a) we show the drift of the left and right peaks of the double peak structured VRS, the solid red plot shows the progression of the left peak without the lock, and the solid blue is the left peak with the cavity lock, the dotted red and blue shows the progression of the right peak without and with the cavity lock respectively. It can be observed that measured drifts in frequency for blue lines do not change with time. In Fig. 7(b) we show the VRS split observed for unlocked (red plot) and locked (blue plot). A consistent VRS split with a standard deviation of 0.83 MHz, when an active lock on the cavity is in place. The red dots are experimental data, The black solid line is the mean, and the light blue band shows the standard deviation

4 Conclusion

In this paper, we have discussed in detail the experimental setup and the techniques used to stabilize a Fabry-Perot cavity. We have demonstrated the ability to dynamically tune the resonant cavity frequency over a range of 100 MHz with under 1 MHz precision. The techniques present here are suitable for a variety of cavity QED experiments. They are especially applicable in studying the interaction between a detuned cavity and ultra-cold dilute gas of atoms [20]. Such a lock strategy can be made compact and portable for future experiments. While in this work a wavemeter has been used, it is not a necessity but a convenience to execute the scheme.

Data availability

The data underlying the results presented in the paper are not publicly available at this time, but may be obtained from authors upon reasonable request.


  1. Purcell EM. Spontaneous emission probabilities at radio frequencies. In: Confined electrons and photons: new physics and applications. Berlin: Springer; 1995. p. 839–.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaynes ET, Cummings FW. Comparison of quantum and semiclassical radiation theories with application to the beam maser. Proceedings of the IEEE. 1963;51(1):89–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Raimond J-M, Brune M, Haroche S. Manipulating quantum entanglement with atoms and photons in a cavity. Rev Mod Phys. 2001;73(3):565.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Thompson R, Rempe G, Kimble H. Observation of normal-mode splitting for an atom in an optical cavity. Phys Rev Lett. 1992;68(8):1132.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Keefe A, Deacon DA. Cavity ring-down optical spectrometer for absorption measurements using pulsed laser sources. Rev Sci Instrum. 1988;59(12):2544–51.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Baev VM, Latz T, Toschek PE. Laser intracavity absorption spectroscopy. Appl Phys B. 1999;69:171–202.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Fiedler SE, Hese A, Ruth AA. Incoherent broad-band cavity-enhanced absorption spectroscopy. Chem Phys Lett. 2003;371(3–4):284–94.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Thorpe MJ, Ye J. Cavity-enhanced direct frequency comb spectroscopy. Appl Phys B. 2008;91:397–414.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbott et al.. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116(6):061102.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Abramovici et al.. Ligo: the laser interferometer gravitational-wave observatory. Science. 1992;256(5055):325–33.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Chan HW, Black AT, Vuletić V. Observation of collective-emission-induced cooling of atoms in an optical cavity. Phys Rev Lett. 2003;90(6):063003.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Guerin W, Michaud F, Kaiser R. Mechanisms for lasing with cold atoms as the gain medium. Phys Rev Lett. 2008;101(9):093002.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Brennecke F, Donner T, Ritter S, Bourdel T, Köhl M, Esslinger T. Cavity qed with a Bose–Einstein condensate. Nature. 2007;450(7167):268–71.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mücke M et al.. Electromagnetically induced transparency with single atoms in a cavity. Nature. 2010;465(7299):755–8.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hernandez G, Zhang J, Zhu Y. Vacuum Rabi splitting and intracavity dark state in a cavity-atom system. Phys Rev A. 2007;76(5):053814.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Culver R et al.. Collective strong coupling of cold potassium atoms in a ring cavity. New J Phys. 2016;18(11):113043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Herskind PF, Dantan A, Marler JP, Albert M, Drewsen M. Realization of collective strong coupling with ion Coulomb crystals in an optical cavity. Nat Phys. 2009;5(7):494–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ray T, Sharma A, Jyothi S, Rangwala S. Temperature measurement of laser-cooled atoms using vacuum Rabi splitting. Phys Rev A. 2013;87(3):033832.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Dutta S, Rangwala S. Nondestructive detection of ions using atom-cavity collective strong coupling. Phys Rev A. 2016;94(5):053841.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawant R, Rangwala S. Lasing by driven atoms-cavity system in collective strong coupling regime. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11432.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Niranjan M, Dutta S, Ray T, Rangwala S. Measuring spatially extended density profiles using atom-cavity collective strong coupling to higher-order modes. Phys Rev A. 2019;99(3):033617.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Alnis J, Matveev A, Kolachevsky N, Udem T, Hänsch T. Subhertz linewidth diode lasers by stabilization to vibrationally and thermally compensated ultralow-expansion glass Fabry-Pérot cavities. Phys Rev A. 2008;77(5):053809.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fox RW. Temperature analysis of low-expansion fabry-perot cavities. Opt Express. 2009;17(17):15023–31.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yu J, Qin Y, Yan Z, Lu H, Jia X. Improvement of the intensity noise and frequency stabilization of nd: yap laser with an ultra-low expansion fabry-perot cavity. Opt Express. 2019;27(3):3247–54.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hirata S, Akatsuka T, Ohtake Y, Morinaga A. Sub-Hertz-linewidth diode laser stabilized to an ultralow-drift high-finesse optical cavity. Appl Phys Express. 2014;7(2):022705.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. White A. Use of cer-vit material in low expansion reference optical cavities. Appl Opt. 1967;6(6):1138–11139.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Notcutt M, Ma L-S, Ye J, Hall JL. Simple and compact 1-Hz laser system via an improved mounting configuration of a reference cavity. Opt Lett. 2005;30(14):1815–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Banerjee S, Johnson S, Vaghasia Y, Palodhi K, Haldar S, De S. Modelling and design of ultra-high stable fabry–pérot cavity. Int J Mech Sci. 2023;250:108299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hodges JT, Layer HP, Miller WW, Scace GE. Frequency-stabilized single-mode cavity ring-down apparatus for high-resolution absorption spectroscopy. Rev Sci Instrum. 2004;75(4):849–63.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Cygan A, Lisak D, Morzyński P, Bober M, Zawada M, Pazderski E, Ciuryło R. Cavity mode-width spectroscopy with widely tunable ultra narrow laser. Opt Express. 2013;21(24):29744–54.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Paldus B et al.. Cavity-locked ring-down spectroscopy. J Appl Phys. 1998;83(8):3991–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Bohlouli-Zanjani P, Afrousheh K, Martin J. Optical transfer cavity stabilization using current-modulated injection-locked diode lasers. Rev Sci Instrum. 2006;77(9).

  33. Roy A, Sharma L, Panja S, De S. “Loop stabilized” improved transfer cavity-based laser frequency stabilization. IEEE J Quantum Electron. 2022;58(2):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Drever RW, Hall JL, Kowalski FV, Hough J, Ford G, Munley A, Ward H. Laser phase and frequency stabilization using an optical resonator. Appl Phys B. 1983;31:97–105.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Black ED. An introduction to pound–drever–hall laser frequency stabilization. Am J Phys. 2001;69(1):79–87.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. Nickerson M. A review of pound-drever-hall laser frequency locking. JILA, University of Colorado and NIST. 2019.

  37. Tavis M, Cummings FW. Exact solution for an n-molecule—radiation-field Hamiltonian. Phys Rev. 1968;170(2):379.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  38. Agarwal G. Vacuum-field Rabi splittings in microwave absorption by Rydberg atoms in a cavity. Phys Rev Lett. 1984;53(18):1732.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would also like to acknowledge the inputs from Dr. Arijit Sharma, Mohamed Ibrahim, and Meena M S.


The authors would like to thank the Department of Science and Technology and Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY), Government of India, under a Centre for Excellence in Quantum Technologies grant with Ref. No. 4(7)/2020-ITEA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



SPD: Conceptualisation, Investigation, Analysis and Writing. VRT,VIG and AB: Investigation, Analysis. SAR: Conceptualisation and Supervision.

All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. P. Dinesh.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dinesh, S.P., Thakar, V.R., Gokul, V.I. et al. Dynamic Fabry-Pérot cavity stabilization technique for atom-cavity experiments. EPJ Techn Instrum 11, 1 (2024).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: