Skip to main content

A compact accelerator driven neutron source at the Applied Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Lund University


The Applied Nuclear Physics Group at Lund University has constructed a CANS (Compact Accelerator-driven Neutron Source). The CANS is based around a 3 MV, single-ended, Pelletron accelerator, which is used to impinge a 2.8 MeV deuterium beam into a beryllium target. The anticipated neutron production will be on the order of 1010 n/s in 4π sr, with future upgrades expected to increase neutron production to 1011 n/s. Neutron energy will be up to 9 MeV with peak emission at 5 MeV. Shielding and moderation will be provided by a large water tank surrounding the target, with exit ports to allow moderated neutrons to be directed to experiments. The thermal-neutron flux at the exit of the extraction ports is anticipated to be up to 106 n/cm2/s. The CANS will be used to forward the activities of the group in the area of neutron-activation analysis, in addition to a broader range of neutron related applications.

1 Introduction

Since 2014, the Applied Nuclear Physics Group at Lund University has provided access to neutrons [1], with a well-established and user-focused infrastructure, emphasising expertise in nuclear physics and neutron-detection techniques. The use of these neutron has contributed to materials research [2] and detector development [3] related to the European Spallation Source [4, 5]. The Applied Nuclear Physics group also has a long history of accelerator-based research; from the development of PIXE [6] in the 1970s to advanced modern detector systems [79] more recently. In 2017, it was decided to combine these areas of expertise and construct a dedicated beamline for neutron production [10]. The new CANS (Compact Accelerator-driven Neutron Source) offers a significant increase in flux over the neutron sources currently used at the laboratory, with an initial neutron-production rate anticipated to be on the order of 1010 n/s in 4π sr and a further increase to 1011 n/s in 4π sr predicted [11]. The CANS is now entering the commissioning phase and, once fully realised, will be comparable to the Kyoto University Accelerator-driven Neutron Source [12]. A schematic overview of how the CANS fits into the pre-existing laboratory environment is presented in Fig. 1. The CANS will use a 3 MV, single-ended Pelletron accelerator to impinge a 2.8 MeV deuterium beam, with currents from 10 to 100 A, into a beryllium target. Resulting neutron energies will be up to 9 MeV with peak emission at 5 MeV. Pulsing of the neutron source will be made possible by periodic deflection of the beam into a tantalum beam-dump. Shielding and moderation is provided by a large water tank surrounding the target.

Figure 1
figure 1

Floor plan for the Nuclear Applications Laboratory, Lund University, with key features of the layout, and major infrastructure components, labelled. The new CANS, which must compete for space in already busy laboratory environment, is place between the pre-existing IBA beamlines

2 Infrastructure at the Nuclear Applications Laboratory

The primary workhorse of the laboratory over the past 30 years, has been a single-ended NEC-3UH Pelletron accelerator, commission in 1990 [13]. This machine has been used primarily for ion-bean analysis, with the application of PIXE, RBS, STIM, NRA, ERCS to a wide variety of fields. Examples of the work conducted are: geology [1417], medicine [18, 19], biology and ecology [2023], meteorology [24], detector development [8, 25, 26], characterisation of nano-structures [27] and astro-geological materials [28, 29]. It is this Pelletron that has been re-purposed as the CANS system.

As well as a comprehensive inventory of α-particle, ꞵ-particle and ɣ-ray sources, the laboratory also possesses a number of radioactive neutron sources: 252Cf, AmBe, PuBe: with a neutron-production rates on the order of 106 n/s in 4π sr. A dedicated irradiation area, incorporating 2.75 m3 water filled shielding-tank, is installed to utilise these sources. The shielding tank, or “aquarium”, has four ports to allow fast neutrons to escape. This set-up has been used extensively in work on ɣ-ray and neutron tagging [3032], and neutron detector development [3335]. In 2019, a GENI-16 neutron generator from SODERN [36] was installed to provide access to fast neutrons with a significant increase in neutron flux. The GENI-16, owned by SKB (Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Company), has a neutron production rate of 108 n/s in 4π sr. It has been used in work related to nuclear safeguards [37], and also in the prototyping of a cyclic-NAA (Neutron-Activation Analysis) system [38, 39] which will ultimately be moved to the CANS.

The laboratory has and a triple ɣ-ray Ir spectrometer, which has been used in astro-geological research [40, 41], and can measure concentration of iridium in sample down to parts-per-trillion. In addition to the detector systems associated with the various experimental set-ups, a wide variety of infrastructure is available. This includes a range of scintillation materials and photomultipliers, HPGe detectors, 3He tubes, a number of multi-channel full digitisers and a 200 channel VME data-acquisition system.

3 Motivations for a CANS

Broadly, the motivation for the development of a CANS at Lund University is to expand the existing efforts in neutron related research, but the immediate application will be in the field of NAA. The Nuclear Applications Laboratory has a history in NAA, that has previously relied on reactor based irradiation of samples but a new, in-lab, cyclic-NAA system is now being developed. A prototype of the new NAA system is currently in operation, with the Genie-16 neutron generator used in place of the CANS which will drive the final configuration. High resolution ɣ-ray spectroscopy and ɣ-ray coincidence spectroscopy will be performed by an array of high-purity Ge detectors, positioned adjacent to the accelerator control room. Sample loading and unloading will be performed at the location of the measurement station to remove the necessity of having to enter the accelerator hall. The cyclic-NAA system will be used to monitor for the presence of specific radionuclides in environmental samples, taken from around the European Spallation Source [42, 43].

In addition to NAA, the CANS is intended to be used: in the develop novel state-of-the-art instruments and methods for the characterisation of spent nuclear fuel, with the purposes of nuclear safeguards; to test and categorise detectors for neutron scattering instrumentation; for work on thermal-neutron tagging; and as an educational platform. Further to these specific motivations, the commissioning of this CANS is part of a larger move towards a CANS network for Europe. At present, several CANS are either being designed or constructed with Europe, including HBS Jülich [44], ESS-Bilbao [45] and SONART [46]. For comparison, Japan boasts a wide a highly integrated network of neutron sources, with large spallation sources such as the Japan Spallation Neutron Source [47], reactor based sources such as JRR-3 [48] and a backbone of CANS facilities [49]. The move towards this network of CANS in Europe is becoming increasingly desirable as the available beam-time at conventional reactor facilities declines [50].

4 Compact neutron source development

The CANS will generate neutrons by the Be(d,n) reaction [51], using a 3 MV, single-ended Pelletron accelerator to impinge a deuterium beam into a thick beryllium target. Deuteron-beam energy will be up to 2.8 MeV with a current of 10 μA, although and upgrade to the ion source of the accelerator is planned which is anticipated to raise the current to 100 μA. At the presently available beam current, the anticipated neutron production will be on the order of 1010 n/s in 4π sr with peak neutron emission at an energy of 5 MeV. The experimental hall in which the Pelletron accelerator is stationed, was formerly used for an electron synchrotron accelerator. The control room for the experimental hall is therefore already well shielded, with a 2 m thick wall. Due to the existing neutron related research activities that take place in the experimental hall, the majority of the other licensing requirement with regards to radiation protection are already fulfilled.

The 9 m long, high-vacuum line that will carry the deuteron beam to the target position is constructed at 0 to the exit of the accelerator. A total of five dipole magnets, four inside the accelerator pressure vessel and one at 2 m from the accelerator exit are used to position the beam. A pair of quadrupole magnets are positioned at 5 m from the accelerator exit, and are used to focus the beam to a diameter of 1 cm on the target. Following the quadrupole magnets, a fast electrostatic-deflector is positioned to allow the beam to be periodically deflected into a Tantalum beam dump. In this way the neutron source can be run in pulse mode with an adjustable duty cycle, and pulse widths down to 25 ns. A number of viewing ports with optical cameras are positioned along the beamline, each with an electrically isolated florescent screen that can be moved into the path of the beam to measure its current and view its profile. A movable Faraday cup is also positioned at 1.5 m from the target. The target itself is a 2 mm thick piece of beryllium, mounted to an electrically isolated flange, externally cooled with deionised water. Current measurement is also made from the target flange.

Shielding and moderation will be provided by a 3000 l water tank surrounding the target, with additional shielding provided by layer of layer of MirroborTM [52] and high-density polyethylene. Illustrations of this construction can be seen in Fig. 2, the design being developed in collaboration with Cipax AB [53]. A total of four ports penetrate the tank, one to facilitate the insertion of the beamline and three for the extraction of neutrons. The three neutron-extraction ports are presently planned to be aligned at 0, 30 and 150 to the incoming deuteron beam. The lower angle ports will extract a higher proportion of fast neutrons, while the higher angle ports will extract a greater proportion of thermal neutrons. Figure 3, shows simulation results, generated in PHITS [5456], which illustrate the higher neutron flux and neutron energy produced from the target in the forward direction. Neutron flux at the NAA irradiation position is expected to on the order of 108 n/cm2/s, this rising to 109 n/cm2/s with the planned upgrade.

Figure 2
figure 2

Concept for the primary-shielding and moderator construction, based on a 3000 l tank of de-ionised water. The internal structure supports the ports for beamline insertion and neutron extraction, as well as providing a fixing point for sample irradiation for NAA

Figure 3
figure 3

Simulated neutron energy spectra, with intensities normalised to units of n/cm2/sμA in reference to the deuteron beam current. Binning of the histograms is according to the CCFE-709 energy-group structure. (a) The source without shielding and moderation in place, for a 2.8 MeV deuterium beam. The influence of the forward momentum of the beam can clearly be seen in the increased neutron flux and neutron energy in the forward direction. (b) At the exit of each of the three neutron-extraction ports

5 Summary and outlook

The Nuclear Applications Laboratory at Lund University already boasts a well-developed infrastructure, incorporating a variety of sources of ionising radiation, with a long history of applied nuclear physics research. A CANS is soon to be added to the existing infrastructure, based on a deuterium beam and a beryllium target. The CANS is predicted to produce thermal neutron fluxes of around 104 n/cm2/s, and fast neutron fluxes of around 106 n/cm2/s, at the exit ports to the shielding assembly. The initial use of the CANS will be the implementation of a cyclic-NAA system, for which samples to be measured are expected to be irradiated with fluxes of around 108 n/cm2/s. A future upgrade of the accelerators ion source is anticipated to increase all neutron fluxes by an order of magnitude over the aforementioned values. The new CANS is aimed at providing proof of principle for a dedicated CANS within Scandinavia, adding to the planned network of CANS for Europe.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.


  1. Perrey H, Elfman M, Fissum K, Frost RJW, De La Rosa N, Kristensson M, Kristiansson P, Mauritzson N, Messi F, Nilsson C, Pallon J, Rofors E. From micro- to macro- neutron sources: the Lund Broad-band Neutron Facility. EPJ Web Conf. 2020;231:01005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. DiJulio D, Cooper-Jensen C, Perrey H, Fissum K, Rofors E, Scherzinger J, Bentley P. A polyethylene-B4C based concrete for enhanced neutron shielding at neutron research facilities. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2017;859:41–6.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Messi F, Mauri G, Piscitelli F. The Multi-Blade: the 10B-based neutron detector for reflectometry at ESS. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2019;936:499–500.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Peggs S, Kreier R, editors. ESS Technical Design Report. ESS-doc-274 (2013). ISBN: 978-91-980173-2-8.

  5. Garoby R, Vergara A, Danared H, Alonso I, Bargallo E, Cheymol B, Darve C, Eshraqi M, Hassanzadegan H, Jansson A, Kittelmann I, Levinsen Y, Lindroos M, Martins C, Midttun Ø, Miyamoto R, Molloy S, Phan D, Ponton A, Sargsyan E, Shea T, Sunesson A, Tchelidze L, Thomas C, Jensen M, Hees W, Arnold P, Juni-Ferreira M, Jensen F, Lundmark A, McGinnis D, Gazis JW, Anthony M, Pitcher E, Coney L, Gohran M, Haines J, Linander R, Lyngh D, Oden U, Carling H, Andersson R, Birch S, Cereijo J, Friedrich T, Korhonen T, Laface E, Mansouri-Sharifabad M, Monera-Martinez A, Nordt A, Paulic D, Piso D, Regnell S, Zaera-Sanz M, Aberg M, Breimer K, Batkov K, Lee Y, Zanini L, Kickulies M, Bessler Y, Ringnér J, Jurns J, Sadeghzadeh A, Nilsson P, Olsson M, Presteng JE, Carlsson H, Polato A, Harborn J, Sjögreen K, Muhrer G, Sordo F. Eur Spall Source Des Phys Scr. 2017;93(1):014001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Johansson SA, Johansson TB. Analytical application of particle induced X-ray emission. Nucl Instrum Methods. 1976;137(3):473–516.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Pallon J, De La Rosa N, Elfman M, Kristiansson P, Nilsson EC, Ros L. A new quantitative X-ray system for micro-PIXE analysis. X-Ray Spectrom. 2017;46(5):319–24.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rofors E, Pallon J, Al Jebali R, Annand J, Boyd L, Christensen M, Clemens U, Desert S, Elfman M, Engels R, Fissum K, Frielinghaus H, Frost RJW, Gardner S, Gheorghe C, Hall-Wilton R, Jaksch S, Kanaki K, Kemmerling G, Kristiansson P, Livingston K, Maulerova V, Mauritzson N, Montgomery R, Perrey H, Richter T, Scherzinger J, Seitz B, Shetty M. Response of a Li-glass/multi-anode photomultiplier detector to focused proton and deuteron beams. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2020;984:164604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frost RJW, De La Rosa N, Elfman M, Kristiansson P, Nilsson E, Pallon J, Ros L. One detector, all the light elements—low-background NRA, RBS and ERDA for the quantification of elements from hydrogen to fluorine. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2021;494–495:34–45.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kristensson M. Characterisation of a neutron experimental station at the Lund Ion Beam Analysis Facility. Master’s thesis. Lund University; 2018. Student Paper 8962519.

  11. Frost RJW, Elfman M, Fissum K, Kristensson M, Kristiansson P, Mauritzson N, Pallon J, Perrey H, Pédehontaa-Hiaa G, Sjöland A, Stenström KE. Development of a pelletron-based compact neutron source. J Neutron Res. 2022;24:281–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tasaki S, Nagae T, Hirose M, Yamashita Y, Hironaka K, Abe Y, Yamagata Y, Otake Y, Hirota K. Properties and possible applications of Kyoto university accelerator based neutron source (kuans). Phys Proc. 2014;60:181–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Malmqvist K, Hyltén G, Hult M, Håkansson K, Knox J, Larsson NO, Nilsson C, Pallon J, Schofield R, Swietlicki E, Tapper U, Changyi Y. Dedicated accelerator and microprobe line. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1993;77(1):3–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hansson HC, Swietlicki E, Larsson NO, Johnsen S. PIXE analysis as a tool for dating of ice cores from the Greenland ice sheet. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1993;75(1):428–34.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bosi F, Naitza S, Skogby H, Secchi F, Conte A, Cuccuru S, Hålenius U, Rosa NDL, Kristiansson P, Nilsson E, Ros L, Andreozzi G. Late magmatic controls on the origin of schorlitic and foititic tourmalines from late-Variscan peraluminous granites of the Arbus pluton (SW Sardinia, Italy): crystal-chemical study and petrological constraints. Lithos. 2018;308–309:395–411.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nilsson E, Kristiansson P, Ros L, De La Rosa N, Elfman M, Hålenius U, Pallon J, Skogby H. A nuclear geochemical analysis system for boron quantification using a focused ion beam. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2017;311(1):355–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. De La Rosa N, Kristiansson P, Nilsson E, Ros L, Pallon J, Skogby H. Quantification of lithium at ppm level in geological samples using nuclear reaction analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2018;317(1):253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pallon J, Knox J, Forslind B, Werner-Linde Y, Teresa P. Applications in medicine using the new Lund microprobe. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1993;77(1):287–93.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sjöland K, Kristiansson P, Tallone P. Nuclear reaction analysis of boron for microbeam analysis of medical samples. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1995;104(1):255–60.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wallander H, Mahmood S, Hagerberg D, Johansson L, Pallon J. Elemental composition of ectomycorrhizal mycelia identified by PCR-RFLP analysis and grown in contact with apatite or wood ash in forest soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2003;44(1):57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Barbin V, Ramseyer K, Elfman M. Biological record of added manganese in seawater: a new efficient tool to mark in vivo growth lines in the oyster species Crassostrea gigas. Int J Earth Sci. 2008;97(1):193–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Nilsson C, Jönsson K, Pallon J. Tolerance to proton irradiation in the eutardigrade Richtersius coronifer—a nuclear microprobe study. Int J Radiat Biol. 2010;86(5):420–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Limburg K, Elfman M. Insights from two-dimensional mapping of otolith chemistry. J Fish Biol. 2017;90(2):480–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Swietlicki E, Martinsson B, Kristiansson P. The use of PIXE and complementary ion beam analytical techniques for studies of atmospheric aerosols. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 1996;109–110:385–94.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Abdel N, Pallon J, Elfman M, Kristiansson P, Nilsson E, Ros L. Radiation tolerance of ultra-thin PIN silicon detectors evaluated with a MeV proton microbeam. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2015;356–357:17–21.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Pallon J, Syväjärvi M, Wang Q, Yakimova R, Iakimov T, Elfman M, Kristiansson P, Nilsson E, Ros L. Ion beam evaluation of silicon carbide membrane structures intended for particle detectors. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2016;371:132–6.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Winzell T, Anand S, Maximov I, Sarwe EL, Graczyk M, Montelius L, Whitlow HJ. Scanning probe microscopy characterisation of masked low energy implanted nanometer structures. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2001;173(4):447–54.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmitz B, Huss GR, Meier MM, Peucker-Ehrenbrink B, Church RP, Cronholm A, Davies MB, Heck PR, Johansen A, Keil K, Kristiansson P, Ravizza G, Tassinari M, Terfelt F. A fossil winonaite-like meteorite in Ordovician limestone: a piece of the impactor that broke up the L-chondrite parent body? Earth Planet Sci Lett. 2014;400:145–52.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Ros L, Kristiansson P, Borysiuk M, Abdel N, Elfman M, Nilsson E, Pallon J. Deuterium/hydrogen microscopy in astrogeological material using an elastic recoil approach. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B. 2015;348:273–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. Scherzinger J, Annand J, Davatz G, Fissum K, Gendotti U, Hall-Wilton R, Håkansson E, Jebali R, Kanaki K, Lundin M, Nilsson B, Rosborge A, Svensson H. Tagging fast neutrons from an 241Am/9Be source. Appl Radiat Isot. 2015;98:74–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Scherzinger J, Al Jebali R, Annand J, Bala A, Fissum K, Hall-Wilton R, Hamilton D, Mauritzson N, Messi F, Perrey H, Rofors E. Tagging fast neutrons from a 252Cf fission-fragment source. Appl Radiat Isot. 2017;128:270–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Scherzinger J, Al Jebali R, Annand J, Fissum K, Hall-Wilton R, Koufigar S, Mauritzson N, Messi F, Perrey H, Rofors E. A comparison of untagged gamma-ray and tagged-neutron yields from 241AmBe and 238PuBe sources. Appl Radiat Isot. 2017;127:98–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scherzinger J, Al Jebali R, Annand J, Fissum K, Hall-Wilton R, Kanaki K, Lundin M, Nilsson B, Perrey H, Rosborg A, Svensson H. The light-yield response of a NE-213 liquid-scintillator detector measured using 2–6 MeV tagged neutrons. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2016;840:121–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Mauritzson N, Fissum K, Perrey H, Annand J, Frost RJW, Hall-Wilton R, Jebali RA, Kanaki K, Maulerova-Subert V, Messi F, Rofors E. GEANT4-based calibration of an organic liquid scintillator. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2022;1023:165962.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mauritzson N, Fissum K, Annand J, Perrey H, Frost RJW, Jebali RA, Backis A, Hall-Wilton R, Kanaki K, Maulerova-Subert V, Maurer C, Messi F, Rofors E. Technique for the measurement of intrinsic pulse-shape discrimination for organic scintillators using tagged neutrons. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2022;1039:167141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tulle PA. Recent works with sealed tube neutron generators. 2000. Tech. rep.

  37. Perrey H, Ros L, Elfman M, Bäckström U, Kristiansson P, Sjöland A. Evaluation of the in-situ performance of neutron detectors based on ej-426 scintillator screens for spent fuel characterization. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect A. 2021;1020:165886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lindsey-Clark J. Development of a neutron Activation analysis station at the Lund Ion Beam Analysis Facility. 2021. Student Paper 9038694.

  39. Frost RJW, Elfman M, Kristiansson P, Lindsey-Clark J, Maurer C, Pallon J, Pédehontaa-Hiaa G. The prototyping of a high-resolution neutron activation analysis system—based on a pelletron accelerator and fast pneumatic sample-transport. J Phys Conf Ser. 2022;2326(1):012019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Boschi S, Schmitz B, Terfelt F, Ros L, Elfman M, Kristiansson P, Sulas C, Monechi S, Montanari A. In: 250 million years of Earth history in central Italy: celebrating 25 years of the geological observatory of Coldigioco. Geological Society of America; 2019.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Goderis S, Sato H, Ferrière L, Schmitz B, Burney D, Kaskes P, Vellekoop J, Wittmann A, Schulz T, Chernonozhkin SM, Claeys P, de Graaff SJ, Déhais T, de Winter NJ, Elfman M, Feignon JG, Ishikawa A, Koeberl C, Kristiansson P, Neal CR, Owens JD, Schmieder M, Sinnesael M, Vanhaecke F, Van Malderen SJM, Bralower TJ, Gulick SPS, Kring DA, Lowery CM, Morgan JV, Smit J, Whalen MT, Scientists IIE. Globally distributed iridium layer preserved within the Chicxulub impact structure. Sci Adv 2021;7(9).

  42. Stenström KE, Barkauskas V, Pedehontaa-Hiaa G, Nilsson C, Rääf C, Holstein H, Mattsson S, Martinsson J, Jönsson M, Bernhardsson C. Identifying radiologically important ESS-specific radionuclides and relevant detection methods. Tech. rep., SSM. 2020.

  43. Pedehontaa-Hiaa G, Bernhardsson C, Barkauskas V, Stenström KE, Rääf C, Mattsson S. Region-specific radioecological evaluation of accidental releases of radionuclides from ESS. Tech. rep., SSM. 2021.

  44. Gutberlet T, Rücker U, Zakalek P, Cronert T, Voigt J, Baggemann J, Doege PE, Mauerhofer E, Böhm S, Dabruck J, Nabbi R, Butzek M, Klaus M, Lange C, Brückel T. The Jülich high brilliance neutron source project—improving access to neutrons. Physica B, Condens Matter. 2019;570:345–8.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sordo F, Fernandez-Alonso F, Terrón S, Magán M, Ghiglino A, Martinez F, Bermejo F, Perlado J. Baseline design of a low energy neutron source at ESS-Bilbao. Phys Proc. 2014;60:125–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ott F, Menelle A, Alba-Simionesco C. The SONATE project, a French CANS for materials sciences research. EPJ Web Conf. 2020;231:01004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Masatoshi A, Fujio M. Japan spallation neutron source (JSNS) of J-PARC. Nucl Phys News. 2009;19(4):34–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Morii Y. Status of the new JRR-3 at JAERI. Neutron News. 1990;1(2):14–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Kiyanagi Y. JCANS network of compact neutron facilities in Japan. EPJ Plus. 2016;131(5):132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. ESFRI Physical. Sciences and Engineering Strategy Working Group—Neutron Landscape Group, Neutron scattering facilities in Europe—Present status and future perspectives. Tech. rep., ESFRI. 2016.

  51. Zuo Y, Tang G, Guo Z, Guo J, Pei Y, Xu J, Wang H, Lu Y. Neutron yields of thick be target bombarded with low energy deuterons. Phys Proc. 2014;60:220–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Mirrotron. Konkoly-Thege Miklós út 29-33; H-1121 Budapest, Hungary.

  53. Brinkheden M, Emander C. Cipax ab, stinsvägen 11, se-763 93 skebobruk, sweden. 2022. Private communication.

  54. Sato T, Iwamoto Y, Hashimoto S, Ogawa T, Furuta T, Ichiro Abe S, Kai T, Tsai PE, Matsuda N, Iwase H, Shigyo N, Sihver L, Niita K. Features of particle and heavy ion transport code system (phits) version 3.02. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2018;55(6):684–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Boudard A, Cugnon J, David JC, Leray S, Mancusi D. New potentialities of the liège intranuclear cascade model for reactions induced by nucleons and light charged particles. Phys Rev C. 2013;87:014606.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  56. Iida K, Kohama A, Oyamatsu K. Formula for proton–nucleus reaction cross section at intermediate energies and its application. J Phys Soc Jpn. 2007;76(4):044201.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors would like to acknowledge both The Swedish Radiation Safety Authority and The Walter Gyllenberg Foundation for funding provided towards the CANS project.


Open access funding provided by Lund University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. J. W. Frost.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Frost, R.J.W., Elfman, M., Fissum, K. et al. A compact accelerator driven neutron source at the Applied Nuclear Physics Laboratory, Lund University. EPJ Techn Instrum 10, 14 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: